Skip to main content

Political conflicts arising from transboundary water management – The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam

Continuing from my previous post, this post will look at The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) and how the construction of the dam has caused political clashes between the three countries involved, Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt. 

The construction of the GERD first started in 2011, and once completed will be the 5th largest in the world (Wheeler et al, 2020). One of the major benefits the dam will bring is hydropower production, which a country like Ethiopia can greatly benefit from to bring energy and power to its people in urban and rural areas. There have been studies that show that energy consumption directly influences the economic development of many countries (Basheer et al, 2021). So, the GERD would significantly improve the economic development of Ethiopia too. However, the downstream countries of Egypt and Sudan disregard it fearing the dam will drastically affect the amount of water available for millions that completely rely on the Nile for their water sources and that the long-term operation of it can lead to future droughts. As a result, Egypt has been proposing changes to the dam from the amount of water that should be filled to the size of the dam, which has created conflict and involved international countries too. 


Egypt has used its international leverage of involving its extensive global connections when it comes to finding solutions during negotiation processes. For example, the USA has threatened to stop development aid to Ethiopia altogether if a resolution is not found. Whereas Ethiopia does not have the same international power to get support from elsewhere, the only way they have been able to do so is through their own residents and its diaspora for funding the dam, as well as Chinese banks (Mbaku, 2020). The key underlying differences between the two countries in terms of development, international leverage and legal aid on an institutional and political level, highlights the challenges of finding a harmonised solution on an effective and sustainable common management of the River Nile (UN Water, 2008). It could be argued that to an extent that this is true, Egypt may have more of a benefit when it comes to expertise and democratic affiliations, but this should be utilised for the benefit of all 11 riparian countries. 

Sharing knowledge and expertise on equitable water resource management is vital and will only significantly improve the growth and development potential of all countries involved, such cooperation is also key especially in today’s climate, where the issues of climate change need to be dealt with now. Climate change is likely to only increase the frequency of flash floods and droughts in the future and is likely to increase panic among Egyptians when water losses are more frequently felt (Wheeler et al, 2020). This paper mentions that the losses are felt more by society than the possible gains and this is the case with Egypt and the GERD, further, fear of potential water losses could spread across the country and lead to the ‘hoarding of seemingly scarce resources’ (Wheeler et al, 2020). To avoid this and further political grievances, and a threat to water availability and security in the Nile Basin, now is the time to share research and co-operate (UN Water, 2008). 

The only way to move forward is to agree on a legal framework co-signed by all 11 countries, yes, the Nile Basin Initiative exists, and Egypt will need to respect this and understand the River Nile is just as much for use by upstream countries too. There needs to be less reliance on international countries to interfere and more on finding joint agreement with just the three countries involved, Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia. Mutual respect and the ability to find resolutions by the governments in the interest of residents themselves is the only way Africa as a continent can start to develop by itself. After all, when a transboundary water basin is jointly managed it will only bring greater economic development, food security, and poverty alleviation.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cooperation in the Eastern Nile Basin ‘beyond the river’

As my last blog post discussed the political grievances between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan regarding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), this post will look further into how political cooperation between the Eastern Nile countries may not be as clear cut as first imagined.  In fact, economic cooperation between Ethiopia and Sudan, despite their failure to find common ground on water cooperation has been thriving in the last 10 years (Tawfik, 2019) . With the backdrop of the signing of the Declaration of Principles (DoP) on the GERD in 2015, there was renewed hope among everyone in the 3 Eastern Nile countries that cooperation on not just water, but all other resources rooted in the water sector such as food, energy and trade would be progressive too (Tawfik, 2019). However, is it possible for that to happen when even the fundamental resource that is contained in the other resources, water, is so difficult to come to an agreement on itself?  Rawia Tawfik in her article explains
2 comments
Read more

Introduction into Water and Politics in Africa

  Welcome to my Blog! The theme I have chosen to base my blog posts around are water and politics. The supply of water wherever in the world is almost certainly entangled in some sort of political issues and conflict. In order for there to be consistency and stability in water and the availability of it, there has to be political stability as well. The two, it could be argued are dependent on each other in order to function sustainably. In Africa, across the 900 million inhabitants the continent is home to, the issue of water availability and access is a persistent problem in some countries. Problems in the past and presently range from the well-known dispute between Egypt and Ethiopia over the well-provisioned development of water from the River Nile, to local political issues in Port Harcourt in Nigeria. Transboundary issues over water resources, whether this is surface water or even groundwater are one of the biggest causes of conflict in Africa.  The continent of Africa heavily rel
2 comments
Read more

Day Zero - new normal for governments in Africa?

‘Day Zero’ and the possibility of it taking place was bound to bring up many questions, some of which remain unanswered. However, the main question will be why such an event was so close to taking place and what must be done so the possibility of it actually happening in the future can be avoided.  Since droughts ravaged the country a woman in Cape Town has started collecting rainwater to fill her swimming pool rather than relying on the state's water supply It’s easy to blame climate change for environmental consequences such as droughts and the reality of regular outbreaks of water crisis. However, in the case of 'Day Zero' climate change was not entirely to blame and it was actually the failure of local officials and the government as a whole for refusing to take responsibility to plan and mitigate for such droughts when the resources for doing so was widely available. This short film by the Cape Town Drought Response Learning Initiative highlights how this was a ‘gover
2 comments
Read more