Skip to main content

The Politics of transboundary water management in the Nile Basin

The Nile Basin is a transboundary water body system that covers around 10% of African territory and includes 11 African countries. This blog post’s focus is on the politics of transboundary water management in the Nile Basin.




The various actions that take place within a transboundary watershed as one would expect spreads many benefits and externalities unevenly across the different states and for the people living in these districts (Jägerskog et al., 2007). With that of course there are increased chances of conflicts between the different regions that use the Nile basin. Therefore, it could be argued that the Nile basin needs to be appropriately managed in order to bring benefits to all its users and to reduce the externalities felt by some countries. However, the question that needs to be addressed is who is responsible to manage such a large basin that runs across several borders. 

The ideas put forward in the paper by Jägerskog and others discusses the notion of how cooperation on the transboundary management of the Nile River Basin itself is a public good and if appropriately managed by investing in water resources infrastructure, it could also be the source for other regional public goods that will increase economic growth and development in the Nile Basin (2007). This is solely a reason why the World Bank funds and supports the vision of the Nile Basin Initiative, which was first established in 1999, and who's main objectives include effectively managing the Nile water resources in a sustainable and equitable way (Abawari, 2011). Some exemplar infrastructural projects such as those that are aimed at mitigating flood and drought risks or improving water quality are aimed at being ‘non-excludable’, ‘non-rivalrous’ and thus defined as a public good, bringing benefits to everyone who ‘consumes’ it. 

It’s important to highlight though that there needs to be multi-lateral cooperation and management of such water resources so that the benefits can be felt by everyone, since the Nile basin runs through different borders and regions. Water resources that are shared and crosses through different borders are easily a source of conflict, but this can be completely avoided if adequate institutions and government bodies on a regional and national scale are in place (Jägerskog et al., 2007). However, is it possible for such institutions to solve the possible conflicts that arise from trying to manage a shared water basin when such processes take a long time to implement and to start functioning, and even then, many of the African countries do not have the financial support to build such institutions in the first place. 

It’s easy to explain that the shared cooperation and management of the Nile Basin will bring benefits to everyone, but it is not as easy to find solutions on how this can be sustainably implemented. Power relations and onus on who is responsible for planning and funding such projects is constantly argued which further fuels political conflict in a continent that is already facing political instability in various forms. Some argue responsibility should fall on the international community as a whole, specifically colonisers, and that if individual Nile countries try to finance such projects themselves it will be too expensive for them. 
Others argue that the Nile Basin Initiative and the top down approach of managing water resources through the interference of the international community is the source of such problems in the first place and local level policy is more appropriate (Abawari, 2011). 

So, I’ll leave the question to you guys, who should take the responsibility of transboundary water management? In my next blog post, a more specific case-study focus in the Nile basin - I will discuss the much-disputed Grand Renaissance Dam in the context of the politics of transboundary water management further, see you soon!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Day Zero - new normal for governments in Africa?

‘Day Zero’ and the possibility of it taking place was bound to bring up many questions, some of which remain unanswered. However, the main question will be why such an event was so close to taking place and what must be done so the possibility of it actually happening in the future can be avoided.  Since droughts ravaged the country a woman in Cape Town has started collecting rainwater to fill her swimming pool rather than relying on the state's water supply It’s easy to blame climate change for environmental consequences such as droughts and the reality of regular outbreaks of water crisis. However, in the case of 'Day Zero' climate change was not entirely to blame and it was actually the failure of local officials and the government as a whole for refusing to take responsibility to plan and mitigate for such droughts when the resources for doing so was widely available. This short film by the Cape Town Drought Response Learning Initiative highlights how this was a ‘gover...
2 comments
Read more

Day Zero – a day to actually highlight the inequalities at stake?

Welcome back to the first part of my final two blog posts! I’ve decided to look at the political factors and implications of climate change on water in Africa for these final posts, as it’s very clear that climate change is the next if not already the biggest threat to human life on earth. Today’s focus will be the inequities that have been highlighted by the possibility of a 'Day Zero' in Cape town back in 2018.   In the 2017-2018 period, the city of Cape Town in South Africa was in the midst of a severe year-long drought and an impending water crisis. The possibility of a ‘Day Zero’ where the 4 million residents of the city would be completely shut out from water supplies in their homes looked more and more probable. This ‘Day Zero’ was anticipated to take place on the 13th of May 2018, when all of the city’s dam levels would have reached a capacity of under 13.5% (Millington and Scheba, 2020) . Graph showing the level of water stored in Cape Town's 6 largest reservoirs...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is it possible to effectively manage transboundary aquifers?

Hello! Today’s post will look at the cooperation on Africa’s transboundary groundwater resources and aquifers.  ‘Many of Africa’s groundwater resources are stored in approximately 40 transboundary aquifer systems’ (Scheumann & Alker, 2009).  Groundwater resources in the past may have been conventionally only used for minimal water use but as the demand for water increases the need for better transboundary aquifer management also increases (Altchenko and Villholth, 2013). There is also increasing shortages and changing quality seen in surface water, thus many turn to groundwater resources to keep up with demands from a rapidly growing population and to keep the agricultural sector afloat in Africa. However, this has led to the over-pumping of these aquifers which mean possibilities of some countries not having enough water available for themselves and risks of conflicts arising between these transboundary countries (Hayton and Utton, 1989).  Locals in Africa measurin...
Post a Comment
Read more