Skip to main content

The Politics of transboundary water management in the Nile Basin

The Nile Basin is a transboundary water body system that covers around 10% of African territory and includes 11 African countries. This blog post’s focus is on the politics of transboundary water management in the Nile Basin.




The various actions that take place within a transboundary watershed as one would expect spreads many benefits and externalities unevenly across the different states and for the people living in these districts (Jägerskog et al., 2007). With that of course there are increased chances of conflicts between the different regions that use the Nile basin. Therefore, it could be argued that the Nile basin needs to be appropriately managed in order to bring benefits to all its users and to reduce the externalities felt by some countries. However, the question that needs to be addressed is who is responsible to manage such a large basin that runs across several borders. 

The ideas put forward in the paper by Jägerskog and others discusses the notion of how cooperation on the transboundary management of the Nile River Basin itself is a public good and if appropriately managed by investing in water resources infrastructure, it could also be the source for other regional public goods that will increase economic growth and development in the Nile Basin (2007). This is solely a reason why the World Bank funds and supports the vision of the Nile Basin Initiative, which was first established in 1999, and who's main objectives include effectively managing the Nile water resources in a sustainable and equitable way (Abawari, 2011). Some exemplar infrastructural projects such as those that are aimed at mitigating flood and drought risks or improving water quality are aimed at being ‘non-excludable’, ‘non-rivalrous’ and thus defined as a public good, bringing benefits to everyone who ‘consumes’ it. 

It’s important to highlight though that there needs to be multi-lateral cooperation and management of such water resources so that the benefits can be felt by everyone, since the Nile basin runs through different borders and regions. Water resources that are shared and crosses through different borders are easily a source of conflict, but this can be completely avoided if adequate institutions and government bodies on a regional and national scale are in place (Jägerskog et al., 2007). However, is it possible for such institutions to solve the possible conflicts that arise from trying to manage a shared water basin when such processes take a long time to implement and to start functioning, and even then, many of the African countries do not have the financial support to build such institutions in the first place. 

It’s easy to explain that the shared cooperation and management of the Nile Basin will bring benefits to everyone, but it is not as easy to find solutions on how this can be sustainably implemented. Power relations and onus on who is responsible for planning and funding such projects is constantly argued which further fuels political conflict in a continent that is already facing political instability in various forms. Some argue responsibility should fall on the international community as a whole, specifically colonisers, and that if individual Nile countries try to finance such projects themselves it will be too expensive for them. 
Others argue that the Nile Basin Initiative and the top down approach of managing water resources through the interference of the international community is the source of such problems in the first place and local level policy is more appropriate (Abawari, 2011). 

So, I’ll leave the question to you guys, who should take the responsibility of transboundary water management? In my next blog post, a more specific case-study focus in the Nile basin - I will discuss the much-disputed Grand Renaissance Dam in the context of the politics of transboundary water management further, see you soon!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cooperation in the Eastern Nile Basin ‘beyond the river’

As my last blog post discussed the political grievances between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan regarding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), this post will look further into how political cooperation between the Eastern Nile countries may not be as clear cut as first imagined.  In fact, economic cooperation between Ethiopia and Sudan, despite their failure to find common ground on water cooperation has been thriving in the last 10 years (Tawfik, 2019) . With the backdrop of the signing of the Declaration of Principles (DoP) on the GERD in 2015, there was renewed hope among everyone in the 3 Eastern Nile countries that cooperation on not just water, but all other resources rooted in the water sector such as food, energy and trade would be progressive too (Tawfik, 2019). However, is it possible for that to happen when even the fundamental resource that is contained in the other resources, water, is so difficult to come to an agreement on itself?  Rawia Tawfik in her article explains
2 comments
Read more

Introduction into Water and Politics in Africa

  Welcome to my Blog! The theme I have chosen to base my blog posts around are water and politics. The supply of water wherever in the world is almost certainly entangled in some sort of political issues and conflict. In order for there to be consistency and stability in water and the availability of it, there has to be political stability as well. The two, it could be argued are dependent on each other in order to function sustainably. In Africa, across the 900 million inhabitants the continent is home to, the issue of water availability and access is a persistent problem in some countries. Problems in the past and presently range from the well-known dispute between Egypt and Ethiopia over the well-provisioned development of water from the River Nile, to local political issues in Port Harcourt in Nigeria. Transboundary issues over water resources, whether this is surface water or even groundwater are one of the biggest causes of conflict in Africa.  The continent of Africa heavily rel
2 comments
Read more

Day Zero - new normal for governments in Africa?

‘Day Zero’ and the possibility of it taking place was bound to bring up many questions, some of which remain unanswered. However, the main question will be why such an event was so close to taking place and what must be done so the possibility of it actually happening in the future can be avoided.  Since droughts ravaged the country a woman in Cape Town has started collecting rainwater to fill her swimming pool rather than relying on the state's water supply It’s easy to blame climate change for environmental consequences such as droughts and the reality of regular outbreaks of water crisis. However, in the case of 'Day Zero' climate change was not entirely to blame and it was actually the failure of local officials and the government as a whole for refusing to take responsibility to plan and mitigate for such droughts when the resources for doing so was widely available. This short film by the Cape Town Drought Response Learning Initiative highlights how this was a ‘gover
2 comments
Read more